A champagne socialist reflects on Western culture and the Universe... and whilst gazing at his navel, he comes up with a lot of useless lint. It is the fruits of this navel-gazing that form the substance of this blog.
"Our" meaning "Australia's"
Published on October 20, 2005 By Champas Socialist In Life
Apparently I need a disclaimer (for the Right's PC brigade):

This article is not an attack on people's right to live in the city. This article is not a political argument. It is simply a philosophical reflection on how I feel about city life and a defence of non-industralised societies. If you like the city, I enjoy hearing from you, and you are entitled to your preferences.

I don’t like the city: I don’t like the concrete. I don’t like the fluorescent lights. I don’t like the fibreglass ceilings.



It’s all so fake. So hard. So devoid of any life. That’s what the city’s soul is made up of. An absence. And we breathe it in. We soak it in through our eyes. Until we become one with it. This nothingness. Til we feel numb. Machines going about our daily lives. Because that’s what’s easiest to do. It’s so easy to fall into that routine. And everybody does it to some extent.



I was walking through the Botanical Gardens just before. It’s rain-soaked. The green shines. The fig trees slurp. The leaves carpet the floor.



And I thought, why would you want to change this? Why would you build anything on this? I feel so comfortable, so happy here. So relaxed, like I don’t feel when I look up at the skyscrapers, or when I stare into the computer, or when I walk along the bitumen.



If I'd always lived in a society where we woke up every morning and saw trees and leaves and grass and LIFE, I would be happy. I would be happy with what I had. And I wouldn’t change it. I wouldn’t seek out progress. I wouldn’t seek out technological advances. I wouldn’t seek out how to make buildings. I’d just be.



I’d find out where the nearest food was and then I’d sit back, relax and marvel at the surrounds. I’d chat and laugh with my friends. I’d go for a swim in the nearby watering hole.



I think that’s why I feel an affinity for Aboriginal culture more than the white man’s culture. I’m still addicted to white man’s culture, but I am slowly breaking that habit.



Man I’m such a hippie!

Comments (Page 2)
2 Pages1 2 
on Oct 26, 2005
Maso, thanks for the thoughts, I think you make a nice point.

the way that allows us to thrive


I don't feel like I'm thriving here. I feel numb.

You've got some really nasty snakes in Australia mate.


And people survived alongside them for many many years. In fact, many of Australia's tribes developed very good relationships with animals now considered dangerous predators before European people came.

Cities are built by all races of men, and there's nothing about a predominantly "white" city that makes it any more soul-less than any other.


Probably not. But cities of the variety that I live in were a European idea. And I don't like them, no matter who makes them.

Singapore is commonly called soulless by those who associate high-tech and no real cultural identity of its own with being soulless.


I've heard that. I don't think I'd like Singapore. It looks soulless to me.

I think it was more because aboriginals don't build cities


Well, yes it was sorta. Many Aborigines do now involve themselves in the building of cities, but they were a European idea.

meant by... who?


The spiritual Dreamtime ancestors. As I say, this is a philosphical blog, not a political blog. By no means am I implying that cities should be abolished. I just don't like them.

Odd coming from you.


Why? I'm a very religious person, I just don't believe in making my religious beliefs the same as my political beliefs (although admittedly I don't believe there is anything spiritually wrong with homosexuality or anything like that).

Oh, I'm sure no one considered being told their way of life was soulless was an insult or anything... lol... Sorry, if there was ever a holier-than-thou kind of blog, this is it.


Point taken, but I think if you read this article without the title, which I always write AFTER the article, it should come across as simply a statement of reflection on city life. Am I obliged to feel good in a city? I don't expect many of you would enjoy the bush either.

Life expectancy drops significantly in your soulful pre-industrial societies.


I know that and I accept it with its flaws and benefits.

on Nov 01, 2005
Yes, but would anyone have read it if I hadn't used that title LW? I was taking a leaf out of your book mate. That said, I agree that I was being hypocritical.
2 Pages1 2