A champagne socialist reflects on Western culture and the Universe... and whilst gazing at his navel, he comes up with a lot of useless lint. It is the fruits of this navel-gazing that form the substance of this blog.
Published on October 2, 2007 By Champas Socialist In Politics
Kebin Andrews is making me really angry today. For a start, apparently we are now no longer accepting African refugees anymore because supposedly they don't integrate/assimilate well enough. As if it's not bad enough that we have apparently now started basing our immigration policy on assimilation, we have now also started basing our refugee policy on it. Andrews says it's not "based on race, as such"!!! But it is sorta hey Kev. Never mind whether the people of Darfur are being carved up by the millions, what matters is whether or not they can pass your stupid citizenship test.

Speaking of which, I've just been having a look at the new citizenship test. There is a booklet that prospective citizens have to read to get the information for the test. It is written in absolute jargonese, bureaucratese gibberish:

"Australian citizens who are living
outside Australia when their children
are born are able to register those
children as Australian citizens at any
Australian diplomatic mission overseas.
This means that their children will
also have access to all the privileges
of Australian citizenship even though
they were not born in Australia."

Many Australians have integrated into Australian society with a far worse grasp of English than is required to read and understand this. I wonder how many Australians would know this information, would be able to understand what it says, would be able to retain the information.

I also learned from the test that Australia has seemingly reintroduced compulsory military service. According to the question, Australians have a responsibility to defend Australia's way of life should the need arise. A vague and bizarre question to have on the test. What do they mean by defend? I wasn't aware this was a responsibility.

Citizens are required to memorise information and phrases that include such words as "guideposts" (is that even a word?!?) "worthy endeavour", "consistent with the pledge of loyalty", "full consular assistance", "equitable" etc. I'd love to see how Australians with a Year 10 or 12 education would go with understanding this brochure.

"While these values are shared by many liberal democracies, they have been adapted to Australia's unique setting, moulded and modernised through waves of settlement by people from all over the world. These values and principles reflect strong influences on Australia's history and culture. These include Judeo-Christian ethics, a British political heritage and the spirit of the European Enlightenment. Distinct Irish and non-conformist attitudes and sentiments have also been important".

Got that?
How many Australians know what the European Enlightenment is? Or Judeo-Christian ethics? In what way have non-conformaist attitudes been important? Does tat mean we are allowed to break the law? What the f do they mean by that phrase? And have the Aborigines had no influence on this country they lived in for 40,000 years minimum?

And once you've got a handle on the values that are important to Australia, don't worry because Australians don't care about them anyway:
"This statement of values should not be seen as a quest for conformity or a common set of beliefs. On the contrary, respect for the free-thinking indivivual and the right to be different are the foundations of Australian democracy."

WTF?! You want citizens to know the important values to Australians, but you value non-conformity to them. Remember that these values we don't have to conform to include equality of men and women, freedom of speech, and peacefulness.

Then there's the info about each state you have to memorise. How many Queenslanders out there knew that:
Victoria is the smallest of the mainland
states in area but the second most
populous and the most densely populated.
The boom years of the 19 th century left
Victoria with a legacy of fine architecture
and ‘Marvellous Melbourne ’ was renowned
as one of the great cities of the southern
hemisphere.

Or that the Northern Territory is twice the size of France?

Are you aware of Australia's other administered lands?:
The Australian Government also
administers Ashmore and Cartier
Islands, hristmas Island, he Cocos
(Keeling) slands, he Coral Sea
Islands, Heard Islands, he McDonald
Islands, Norfolk Island and the
Australian Antarctic Territory.

I've never even heard of most of these!

There are pages and pages of historical facts to memorise, including what poet Henry Lawson's mother did, when the first Melbourne Cup was held, where Phar Lap's body is now held, who the first female politician was, the differences between the Labor and Liberal Parties, Australia's early ettitudes towards protectionist economic policies, when the Arbitration Court first set the minimum wage (and what the arbitration court is), details of the Eureka stockade, why we originally had the White Australia Policy (according to the booklet),

Some people make me genuinely ashamed of being Australian. There are many things I am proud of about being an Australian. But this is not one of them.

Comments
on Oct 02, 2007
I can understand all that(except that non-conformist thing)...but I'm pretty well read. I really don't know a whole about Australia...so I would still probably be studying for awhile before I took on that test. Though I don't believe many people, especially refugees, could really understand this to the full extent.

~Zoo
on Oct 03, 2007
I've been wondering what was in the test and now I've heard, I'm disgusted. This is so friggin' typical of this Liberal government, who continue to prove just how out of touch they are. I don't even know the names of all our administered territories, let alone what Henry Lawson's mother did. And as for Judeo-Christian ethics, I've been trying to purge myself of my Christian Brothers/Roman Catholic guilt-laden indoctrination ever since I understood what exactly is was all about.

Kevin Andrews and the rest of the Liberal government are determined to step us back to the 50's, when all men were equal except if you were Aboriginal, Islander, non-English European or Asian.

I'm not ashamed, I'm sickened.
on Oct 03, 2007
The citizenship test is a joke. Most people so far has passed it anyway - I think only one person has failed so far, so the questions can't be that hard. there'll be another 100 in canberra this weekend so we'll see how that goes to get a more reliable percentage.

As for the Sudanese, I can understand why the government would be leery. Sure, they came from a bad place where they could have been killed at any moment, but if they can't become part of our society - and it seems the Sudanese do have particular problems with that - we can't force them to. We're better off prioritising the people we help so we get those who fit in better and therefore we provide the greatest benefit with our limited resources.

There are other refugee-accepting states in the world, there must be one which is a better fit for the Sudanese.
on Oct 03, 2007

Guidesposts is a Christian inspirational magazine (at least here in the states). SO I guess it is a word.

I dare say that from the little you have posted, most Americans would not qualify either.

on Oct 05, 2007
I don't believe Australians are interested in the sort of race-based politics that snuck John Howard into office in 2001. The Liberals are trying hard to find a wedge, but most Australians recognise that African people are under-represented in crime statistics (not cacto, but most). That indicates to me that they are actually fitting in with our values very well. I am proud of the way Africans have come to Australia, sought jobs and obeyed the law. Questions of assimilation, or the new buzz word "integration" are outdated questions for a bygone era.


on Oct 05, 2007
Questions of assimilation, or the new buzz word "integration" are outdated questions for a bygone era.


Hear, hear...
on Oct 05, 2007
I'd like to say that my previous post was largely said on the basis that I am 100% full of shit on this issue.

I just had a look at the figures, spoke to a few peeps and have now come to the conclusion that I was totally misguided on the 'Sudanese haven't been fitting in' argument.

So yeah, consider this my retraction on everything except the citizenship test - I still think it's retarded, and I still think the evidence suggests it is pretty easy to pass.

The Liberals are trying hard to find a wedge, but most Australians recognise that African people are under-represented in crime statistics (not cacto, but most).


I wouldn't be too sure about that. Today Tonight is perhaps Australia's greatest measure of public opinion, and they're pushing the 'evil Sudanese' line quite hard at the moment.

I reckon the wedge is failing not because it's a weak issue, but because people see in K-Rudd a nice happy clone of Howard without ministerial losers like Abbott or Downer.

That and Australians are a sucker for a change of scenery every once in a while.
on Oct 06, 2007
Cacto, I applaud you in your retraction. What worries me though is that most Australians would not go to the trouble you have to realise that Today Tonight is sprouting shit out of its ears. I have always considered you an intelligent, thinking individual, so if you are capable of falling for a line about the Sudanese, what hope is there for the majority of Australians, who are not as keenly interested in getting informed?
on Oct 07, 2007
What worries me though is that most Australians would not go to the trouble you have to realise that Today Tonight is sprouting shit out of its ears.


Don't get me wrong - I wasn't convinced by Today Tonight. It's a great way of getting informed about what views are perceived to be mainstream, but it's not something you go round putting faith in even if it's taking an unusually rational line.

I'd just been hearing some rather persuasive little arguments from some political friends and didn't think to question their motives in feeding me these lines. I'm just glad I didn't get the job of writing about it and make myself look like a jackass in public.
on Oct 07, 2007
Are you aware of Australia's other administered lands?:
The Australian Government also
administers Ashmore and Cartier
Islands, hristmas Island, he Cocos
(Keeling) slands, he Coral Sea
Islands, Heard Islands, he McDonald
Islands, Norfolk Island and the
Australian Antarctic Territory.

I've never even heard of most of these!


hehe, i think some refugees have, since they usually aim for some of these islands

i don't have a problem with a citizenship test per se, but this one seems a little over the top.

I also learned from the test that Australia has seemingly reintroduced compulsory military service. According to the question, Australians have a responsibility to defend Australia's way of life should the need arise. A vague and bizarre question to have on the test. What do they mean by defend? I wasn't aware this was a responsibility.


just take a sickie, or did they not put a reference to this great tradition in the test?