A champagne socialist reflects on Western culture and the Universe... and whilst gazing at his navel, he comes up with a lot of useless lint. It is the fruits of this navel-gazing that form the substance of this blog.
Published on September 9, 2004 By Champas Socialist In Current Events
“Australia Attacked”. That was the esteemed Courier-Mail’s headline this morning to announce that 8 Indonesians were killed, 160 Indonesians were injured and one Australian was injured in Indonesia. A bomb went off in the Australian embassy. The Courier Mail seems more concerned about Australian buildings than Indonesian lives.

Many Australians responded with similar lack of concern for Indonesians in the wake of the Bali bombings. Despite the Indonesians being our closest neighbours, we don’t seem to care much about them. The Bali bombings that destroyed Indonesian businesses and families has constantly been portrayed in our media as an Australian tragedy. Very little has been said about the Indonesians. I’ve not seen any profiles on Indonesians affected by the tragedy. That is not to say that it wasn’t an Australian tragedy. Every life lost or affected by that gruesome attack is a tragedy. And it is senseless violence, which I deplore. But it amazes me how little we care about foreigners. Or at least specific foreigners. During the Olympics, Aussies were seen claiming any New Zealand medal as “practically one of ours”, yet rarely do we feel the same way about those in Indonesia. And perhaps I shouldn’t be surprised in a nation with an ageing population, a large proportion of our people lived comfortably with the White Australia Policy. And still do.

It is interesting to note the reactions of different nations that read down the side of the Jakarta Post:
Greece condemns Jakarta attack
Thais condemn Jakarta attack as Australians step up security
New Zealand appalled at Jakarta bomb blast
Australia says not intimidated by Jakarta blast

To see the Jakarta Post’s reports you can visit
http://www.thejakartapost.com/headlines.asp

Last week, one member of our Government commented following the horrible attack on that school in Russia that it demonstrated the need for Australia’s stance on terrorism to remain tough. So explain to me again how exactly is the Government’s “tough” stance on terrorism helping to prevent terrorism?

I find it hard to express my feelings of sadness for the people who have been affected by this blast. So instead I would simply like to echo the words of Indonesian president Megawati Sukarnoputri:

"Let us condemn this incident that has taken the lives of innocents ... I also express my deepest condolences to the families of the victims,".

Comments
on Sep 11, 2004
For starters, both the Government and opposition have expressed their deepest condolences to the Indonesians who lost their lives. Also, of course Jakarta’s paper would proclaim that Australia isn't intimidated. The attack was a statement to us; they just suck at aiming that's all.

Every report I have read has mentioned how the Indonesians lost lives, some protecting our embassy. Both sides of government have even given special mention to them. We aren't that self indulgent, but man, that attack was directed at us. We have to make it clear we aren't intimidated.
on Sep 11, 2004
The PM announced a $1 million dollar aid package for the survivors and the families of the dead within 24 hours of the blast. I don't like him, but you have to give him credit for that.
on Sep 11, 2004
The PM announced a $1 million dollar aid package for the survivors and the families of the dead within 24 hours of the blast. I don't like him, but you have to give him credit for that.


It's certainly within our national interests to make sure the Indonesians are happy... I applaud JH for this clever international diplomacy.

You can have a tough stance on terrorism whist maintaing freindly relationships with the nations that inadvertantly harbor terrorists... The Indonesians would be just as happy, if not more so to hunt and convict these terrorists - an upgraded travel warning from the department of foreign affairs and trade hurts their economy tremendously - Terrorism directed towards Australia is a regional problem, not only an Australian threat.

BAM!!!
on Sep 13, 2004
"The PM announced a $1 million dollar aid package for the survivors and the families of the dead within 24 hours of the blast. I don't like him, but you have to give him credit for that."

Quite honestly, I wasn't really talking about Howard or the Government specifically in this instance. I was simply reflecting on white Australian journalists in general and how this feeds into our society.

I never said we shouldn't say we're not intimidated, if that's the specific stance that we think will yield the best results (which I'm not so sure about as I briefly mentioned). I never said it wasn't meant as a political statement against Australia. Of course it was. But I still found it strange that the CM ran a huge profile on the one Aussie girl injured on their front page, while simply mentioning (that is reporting) that Indonesians were killed too. I mean I didn't know the kid and I relate to her no more or less than the other poor souls harmed.

Although we should take note of the political statement being directed at us, we should also note that this is an Indonesian tragedy, not an Australian tragedy. My comment still stands about the distinction between NZ and Ind. Where do you think that stems from exactly?
on Sep 13, 2004
Although we should take note of the political statement being directed at us, we should also note that this is an Indonesian tragedy, not an Australian tragedy. My comment still stands about the distinction between NZ and Ind. Where do you think that stems from exactly?


Are you being serious? Australia and New Zealand were both colonised by the British - Indonesia wasn't. Of course we feel naturally aligned with New Zealand, they are culturally the same as us... Indonesians aren't... does that make us dislike Indonesians more? I can only speak for myself, but any Indonesian is as much my brother as any Kiwi...

BAM!!!
on Sep 14, 2004
I still found it strange that the CM ran a huge profile on the one Aussie girl injured on their front page, while simply mentioning (that is reporting) that Indonesians were killed too.

Couldn't agree more, Champas. Sad to say, this is a common fault of the press - and not just in Australia, but overseas too. (The Sun in the UK is a flagrant repeat offender.) I can only assume this practice to be fuelled by a desire to tug at nationalistic heartstrings. As the readership, we have a duty to let them know that they underestimate their audience.

Not that I wish it on anybody, but now that there may be Australians taken hostage in Iraq, I can't help wondering how Australian press attitudes to the war may change ...

(There ... that reply wasn't too 'communistical' for you, was it?)
on Sep 15, 2004
The Kiwis the same as us?!?! For a start they had a much higher population of Celts than we did. It has been said many a time that the reason for the Kiwi accent is owing to the Scottish, wheras Australian accents owe much more to the English, particularly London heritage. The Kiwis are a much more forward thinking, compassionate nation than us. Many Kiwis resent us as being brash and outspoken, so they clearly see a difference. That is not saying there is no ANZAC spirit left and no similarities, but may I remind you the Indonesians were invaded by the Dutch, fellow Europeans.
I am glad you claim not to dislike Indonesians any more than Kiwis, but when I see spreads such as the Coruier mail's, forgive me if I express some scepticism that this is a widely held belief.
Notably, the NT Times, the closest paper to the Indonesians didn't even think the bomb blast was front page news, instead preferring to run an old news local story. Ten News also thought that the Adelaide show was more important than the bomb blast....
Not that self-indulgent? Give me a break!