A champagne socialist reflects on Western culture and the Universe... and whilst gazing at his navel, he comes up with a lot of useless lint. It is the fruits of this navel-gazing that form the substance of this blog.
Published on January 16, 2005 By Champas Socialist In Politics
I have strong political beliefs about a lot of things as you probably know. I have an opinion about refugees, drugs, diplomacy, environmental policy, immigration, abortion, social security etc. And the curious thing is that 99% of my beliefs probably fall under the category of Left wing politics. Why?

It seems strange to me that anyone else combines all the beliefs I do. I see a lot of my opinions as being separate from each other. For instance, I believe in increasing immigration because I like a diverse range of people and I like a diverse range of cultures. Although I also happen to think it will help Australia economically, that is not my reason for liking immigration. So I don't understand the connection between my liking of immigration and say my dislike of major corporate companies and their greed-based values. After all, a lot of the immigrants coming out here are Right wingers themselves. I've noted on several occasions that the irony of being Left is that half the time you're sticking up for the rights of Right wingers.

Equally I don't think we should destroy the environment. I think we need to preserve the planet for all of the Earth's creatures that will live in the future. So why would that have anything to do with my belief that we should decriminalise marijuana? In fact why should that belief have anything to do with the fact that I believe that we should help people with drug addictions by providing "safe" heroin injection rooms and other similar ideas? After all, my opinion on marijuana is shaped by an opinion that people should have the right to take the three soft drugs; alcohol, marijuana and nicotine. My opinion on heroin injecting rooms is based on trying to help people with an addiction.

I think we need unions to create better conditions for workers. But why should this have anything to do with the fact that I think we should have more "liberal" sex laws in order to lower the rates of rape and child molestation? I suppose you can link those together a bit more easily, but it isn't immediately obvious.

I can see the connection between some of my beliefs. Many of them are drawn together by what is often referred to as "compassion" I suppose. I don't believe in locking up refugees because it is not nice. I don't like war because it is aggressive. I like immigrants because I like people. I think we should have the choice to have abortions because I think the alternatives will cause social problems. And I believe in gay rights and women's rights because I believe in equal rights for all people. It's a general belief in humanity and a liking for people that draws this all together. But the rest? They've got nothing to do with each other.

Yet I am certainly not alone in drawing these beliefs together. The Greens draw together a lot of my opinions in one party. The opinions I had four years ago were drawn together perfectly by the Democrats. However, when it comes to choosing between the two major parties, I don't necessarily think that Labor's half-arsed Leftist approach (really it's more of a Centrist-Right approach) is necessarily a better option than Liberal's Right-Right-Right option.

It certainly is something pertaining specifically to our times to link these things together. I have often commented that labels like Left/Right are silly. I mean even today, although I hate Pauline Hanson's cultural supremacist views, I agree with her view that we should not sell off Telstra. I agree with Labor Right's opinion that public Health is better for the country because it pays off dividends in the long run. But I disagree with their policy of destroying cross media ownership laws. I agree with Family First that we need strong child protection laws, but I strongly disagree with their anti-abortionist stance. Looking back historically, Plato and I both believe in gay rights, but I don't agree with his chauvinism. I agree with Edmund Barton's protectionist stance, but I certainly disagree with the White Australia Policy. And I agree with traditional Aboriginal attitudes to the environment but I certainly disagree with their tribal wars.

The only thing I can conclude is that the current paradigm of Leftist thought, as many would label it, is a reaction to the specific problems of our day and designed as a response to meet the specific needs of our current society.


Comments (Page 3)
3 Pages1 2 3 
on Jan 18, 2005
Reply By: jeblackstarPosted: Tuesday, January 18, 2005Nice Score?Is that what you want to hear? ::looks confused::Cheers


naw jeb, just wanted to point out while the left leaning loosers lash out at me constantly, not one comment when I post either something good or are inline with there own philosophy. and thank you
on Jan 18, 2005
And lets not forget that the earth is round... Keep going left and you'll end up to the right, and vice versa. (extreme right is very close to extreme left)
on Jan 18, 2005
While I loath breaking up this lovefest of lefties I also took this test and will now post what I test to be.

Econ.left/right -4.00
social lib./ auth. -2.05

while you are all bizy slapping each other on the backs espousing what great champions of the people you all are...and how low and evil we are.. TRY...if you can wrap your brains around this..

just try to remember {as I do} its takes 2 wings for the eagle to fly... a left wing and a right one.


Wow. You're really one of us...(childern chanting like in a typical horror movie)...one of us...one of us...one of us...one of us...one of us...
on Jan 19, 2005
yall seem to have damaged the politcalcompass site.  it's not online
on Jan 19, 2005

yall seem to have damaged the politcalcompass site. it's not online

I think Moderateman's score blew a few tubes in their mainframe!

on Jan 19, 2005
Reply By: latour999Posted: Tuesday, January 18, 2005While I loath breaking up this lovefest of lefties I also took this test and will now post what I test to be.Econ.left/right -4.00social lib./ auth. -2.05while you are all bizy slapping each other on the backs espousing what great champions of the people you all are...and how low and evil we are.. TRY...if you can wrap your brains around this..just try to remember {as I do} its takes 2 wings for the eagle to fly... a left wing and a right one.Wow. You're really one of us...(childern chanting like in a typical horror movie)...one of us...one of us...one of us...one of us...one of us...


I know you and I bump heads alot, but politically and philosophically we are not that far apart........ scarey is'nt it>
on Jan 19, 2005
Reply By: kingbeePosted: Wednesday, January 19, 2005yall seem to have damaged the politcalcompass site. it's not online


I know I was shocked too, poor site might never recover.. lol
on Jan 23, 2005
I am a democrat 100%
on Jan 23, 2005
I know you and I bump heads alot, but politically and philosophically we are not that far apart


"I regret that we meet in this way. You and I are of a kind. In a different reality, I could have called you friend." -Romulan commander in classic Star Trek episode Balance of Terror
on Jan 25, 2005
champas, my view is that politics is a little like music... hear me out here... all the best bands are making music that uses so many of the "labels" that it can't really be classified. however moderate use of the labels (eg. rock, soul, classical, punk) give people a starting point to understanding what you're all about.

you're leftish. keep explaining from there. it's interesting.
on May 15, 2005
Bugger me champas, you had me fooled, I had you pegged as a right royral rnazie, just kidding, if you are a left winger so what willread other comments, butr pretty much who would dare to critise the current administration is fair game for the above name, and i have to admit I am a letie and proud of it , nort as a badge, just because I think that anyone who cares seems to get this brand.
3 Pages1 2 3