A champagne socialist reflects on Western culture and the Universe... and whilst gazing at his navel, he comes up with a lot of useless lint. It is the fruits of this navel-gazing that form the substance of this blog.
The Refugee Series: Part 1
Published on April 3, 2005 By Champas Socialist In Politics
The other night I spent several hours chatting with 4 refugees. 3 are Afghanistani, 1 is from Eritrea (sort of part of Sudan but not). I would like to tell you about some of the interesting things I remember that these 4 very nice, gentle men told me about their life experiences.

Chaman had spent 3 years in a refugee detention centre, enduring 45 degree Celsius days, awaiting the approval of his refugee status. He fled Afghanistan because of the Taliban, who were enforcing a very strict form of Islam. He had been beaten up for not following Taliban law. He also knew that he was going to be very soon called up to fight for the Taliban. So he sold his shop and used the money to pay someone to smuggle him across the border into Pakistan. He had never even heard of Australia at this stage. The only white people Chaman knew of in the world were Americans.

When Chaman got to Pakistan he was introduced to another people smuggler. Through a long process of going from country to country, he eventually paid a people smuggler who took him and others on a boat to Australia. He spent a month and a half on this rickety boat, fearing being eaten by sharks.

Upon arrival in Australia we put Chaman in detention because he hadn’t heard about the offshore refugee processing (the queue everyone talks about) when he was back in Afghanistan. Surprisingly, the Taliban hadn’t publicised it very widely and so he had had to use “illegal” people smuggling. I resisted telling him how immoral I thought it that he didn’t use the queue.

While he was in detention the Government tried to convince him to go back to Afghanistan. They told Chaman that the Taliban had been ousted and that the war was over. He had heard enough from other sources to suggest to him that this was not the case: although the Coalition has gained control of Kabul, the capital, the war continues outside of Kabul. The Taliban are still able to enforce their version of Islamic law, and are still perpetrating violence against anyone who doesn’t conform to their strict Islamic law. Still the Australian Government insisted that the war was over. So Chaman asked the Government to guarantee that if he went back nothing would happen to him. Ummmm...errrr...well no we can’t do that. Why not? Well...errrr....here’s $2000 we’ll give you if you want to go back. But why can’t you guarantee my safety? Look over there, 2 grand!

But Chaman had already spent 4 and a half grand getting to Australia and was not about to be paid 2 grand to go back and die. Funny that. These Afghanis are so ungrateful.

Chaman was a very nice person but still seemed shaken. His body language suggested he was still a little insecure and he was withdrawn from the social situations of the night. When I asked him about his time in the detention centre he started to shake a bit and was quite visibly uncomfortable. He also told me that apart from the problems the Taliban created for him that he had a pretty good life back in Afghanistan but that he much preferred Australia. Chaman has started work here and is determined to make a go of it in Australia.

Comments
on Apr 03, 2005
It'd be interesting to see how he eventually makes out. I hope you have a sequel to this thought-provoking blog.
on Apr 04, 2005

Eritrea (sort of part of Sudan but not).

Actually not.  Ethopia was awarded stewardship of it in 1952, annexed it in 1962, and then fought a 30 year civil war for independance.  They eventually won, but it is still one of the poorest places on earth.

on Apr 04, 2005
Thanks scatter. If I get any email contact I'll see what I can do.
Dr Guy, thanks for the clarification. Ghoebre did take us through that little historical point, but I was trying to put it in a way that wasn't going to get bogged down in a lengthy political explanation of the constant moving of borders and the relations between "countries".
on Apr 05, 2005

Dr Guy, thanks for the clarification. Ghoebre did take us through that little historical point, but I was trying to put it in a way that wasn't going to get bogged down in a lengthy political explanation of the constant moving of borders and the relations between "countries".

I should also have added that I enjoyed your article.  Apparently, Australia has the same immigration problems that the US does.  If you boot his butt back home, you are heartless and cruel.  If you let him stay, then you have to open the floodgates.

A cant win situation.

on Apr 05, 2005
Dr. Guy hit it in one. It's lose/lose situation. Australia, like the US (from what i know which isn't much) takes the National Security option which I happen to prefer. I know it has it's downsides, but I'll take those compared to the downsides of the other options.
on Apr 05, 2005
Read a piece in a Philsophy book that stated it the same way and talked about camps in Australia (of all places).

Great post!!

- GX
on Apr 08, 2005
Great article Champas, but since you actually did real research with people that experienced it first hand I'm afraid we will have to kick you off Joeuser. We can't have that sort of informed article on here.
on Apr 12, 2005
Thakyou Dr Guy, Xiozan and Tobler for the positive feedback. FishHead, welcome back.

"If you boot his butt back home, you are heartless and cruel. If you let him stay, then you have to open the floodgates."

Well I wouldn't exactly see it that way. The floodgates are still open. Around 98% of people detained in Australia's refugee camps are eventually released into the community with refugee status of some nature (like Chaman and Ghoebre). The question is how we treat those refugees until such time as the Immigration Department gets off its sorry a**e and processes their applications. As our Christian Right party, Family First have suggested, we need to reintroduce compassion into our refugee policy. This has a direct effect on the mental wellbeing of Australia's future families, such as those of Chaman and Ghoebre. Our national secuirty needs to be maintained (in my opinion) , but this probably includes not making future citizens go insane and psycho. Quicker processing and livable detention centres are necessary. That to me is not a lose/lose situation. It's a question of balance as Family First says. And currently the balance is wrong.