A champagne socialist reflects on Western culture and the Universe... and whilst gazing at his navel, he comes up with a lot of useless lint. It is the fruits of this navel-gazing that form the substance of this blog.
The Refugee Series Part 2
Published on April 11, 2005 By Champas Socialist In International
The other night I spent several hours chatting with 4 refugees. 3 are Afghanistani, 1 is from Eritrea. I would like to tell you about some of the interesting things I remember that these 4 very nice, gentle men told me about their life experiences.

US and France’s part in poverty and war
Ghoebre came from Eritrea which is in Africa. An Australian Christian Brother sponsored him to come out here. For this he was very fortunate and the visa protection is much better than for his Afghani friends. I didn’t get to speak to him for long, but we talked about Africa a bit. He was an extremely well-spoken person and is working very hard at his job in Australia. He seemed very happy to have the opportunity to work in Australia as it gave him independence and the ability to support himself and thus enjoy Australian life.

He told us that war is a very big problem in his country because it creates poverty. The land has been destroyed by war. Farmers are unable to tend the land when they are constantly having to focus on war and protecting their lives. Of course this leads to people becoming very greedy and protective of their land, which only leads to more jealousy and war. He said that if it weren’t for all the wars, that his country could produce enough food to feed its people. His face lit up when he spoke of the way food in his country is “all natural”. “If you want milk, you go to a cow and you drink. If you want fruit, you go to a tree and you eat it.”.

I asked him why he thought there were so many wars in his country. He said that there are several reasons but as he had seen it, there was one main reason. America and France produce a lot of artillery. They of course need a market for these weapons, so they go to Africa and convince a group of people there “Hey there are these people over there who want to invade your land. If you want to keep your land, you’re going to need these weapons. Have a look at these guns. Look at how they shoot. They will protect you against them. You need these.”. Then they go to the other group and tell them the same story. A division is created, the seeds of jealousy are planted and war breaks out. (And you wonder why we turned a blind eye on Rwanda).

I think he is aware that this is not all there is to it, that these situations are complicated. But I still found it interesting to hear someone from these places say this about how his country works, him having only been in Australia a few months.

Comments
on Apr 14, 2005
This message board looks really lonely old buddy. So for the record whatever it is your talking about....I'm against it (I think I have a 50% chance of being right there).
on Apr 14, 2005
I think your Eritrean friend has the cart before the horse.  While I have no doubt that France and perhaps the US was selling them weapons, the truth is that someone would have if those 2 had not.  France and the US did not create the market, they just filled it.
on Apr 15, 2005
Dr Guy, I suppose that's a possibility and I don't think either of us can really know which is the truth. Probably a bit of both in there, (a chicken and the egg question?) but I have to say that I think that the fact this guy lived there gives him some authority. Either way it's a sad situation and I don't think the fact that someone else would have provided the weapons gives the US an excuse to do it. Sometimes you have to take a stand (like how I don't gamble, even though I love it).

Toblerone "Ooooooh loook at me, my blog is soo popular compared to my best mate's" Aardvark, go write about how you can't get a woman on your own site.
on Apr 15, 2005

Either way it's a sad situation and I don't think the fact that someone else would have provided the weapons gives the US an excuse to do it.

I was not trying to defend the US in this situation (SHOCK! Sometimes I do disagree), just in stating that natue abhors a vacuum.

And even that is not a justification for it.  Sometimes you have to take the right course, not the most expedient.  I know if the US backed out of the weapons sales to places like that, we would be vilified for doing that to.  But I can live with that type of villification.

Besides, if France was the only place supplying weapons, there would be a lot less killing!  French Weapons, isnt that another oxymoron?

on Apr 15, 2005
Toblerone "Ooooooh loook at me, my blog is soo popular compared to my best mate's" Aardvark, go write about how you can't get a woman on your own site.


Now now Champas be nice.

If you want fruit, you go to a tree and you eat it


I like trees, but I couldn't eat a whole one, *ba dom tish*

“Hey there are these people over there who want to invade your land. If you want to keep your land, you’re going to need these weapons. Have a look at these guns. Look at how they shoot. They will protect you against them. You need these.”. Then they go to the other group and tell them the same story. A division is created, the seeds of jealousy are planted and war breaks out.


Man it sounds like the sort of hairbrained scheme they'd use in a cartoon....of for that matter the sort of hairbrain scheme John Howard would use against the the Republicans before the referendum (well the causing division thing anyway).
on Apr 30, 2005
Labor, Slavery & The Abuse of Capitalism

Labor is an expression of our deepest essence. Our labor is sacred, in a sense, a fundamental and profound manifestation and creativity. Capitalism defiles and perverts work. Intellectual and physical labor is a mere commodity that must be sold to a buyer. In American society, most of us are alienated from our labor activity and from the product of that intellectual or physical labor. Our productive activity is not our own, the production created is not our own. We are thereby alienated from our own sweat. Your labor is an expression of you, of your deepest and truest self, but in a capitalist society workers activity belongs to another, it is the loss of his self. Labor creates all wealth. When your labor belongs to another, you are left with nothing. You are nothing. I am nothing and I should be everything. Capitalism is a system designed to steal. That theft is so grand that it is hard to fathom.

In America, it began with the genocide of Native American peoples, continued with the capture and enslavement of Africans and marches on today with an assault on U.S. and foreign labor headed by multinational corporations and euphemistically known as globalization. Capitalism compels all nations, on pain of extinction to adpot bourgeois mode of production, it compels them to introduce what it calls civilization into their midst to become bourgeois themselves. It happens as this is written in the U.S. occupation of Iraq today. Capitalism must and will expand at the cost of life, freedom, culture, or anything else in the way of profit.