A champagne socialist reflects on Western culture and the Universe... and whilst gazing at his navel, he comes up with a lot of useless lint. It is the fruits of this navel-gazing that form the substance of this blog.
Published on April 20, 2005 By Champas Socialist In Politics
I just attended a forum on student unionism. I asked the people there to respond to some criticism I had of compulsory student unionism and I felt they responded rather well. Here, I have tried to summarise some of their points.

Why should I pay fees for political protests I don’t agree with?

3% of student union fees are put towards political campaigns. For instance, one recent demonstration outside a minister’s office cost the guild a grand total of $5.

It is important that student unions stick up for student rights, and unfortunately some of these battles, such as HECS fees are inherently political. Even so, this is not where the vast majority of the union’s efforts and funds are directed.

What use is the Union anyway?

Many of the Union’s little victories go unpublicised. For instance, originally Brendan Nelson wanted to allow HECS fees to increase by 30%. Thanks to a concerted nation-wide Unions-led campaign, he reduced that to 25%.

Every day Union workers have little successes that make their job worthwhile, like when a student is kicked out of the Uni on unfair grounds and the Union manages to get that student reinstated. Do you really want it so that only the students who can afford legal representation can get reinstated?

What about all those social clubs I don’t belong to? Why should I pay for them?

University culture has always made the place more exciting to attend. Uni culture is perhaps not as strong as it was in the 1970s, but even today, places like the refec allow students to make friends and discuss problems with their courses with each other. These are important support networks for us as we go through the very stressful process of studying for a degree.

A lot of students sign up for clubs and societies at the start of the year which they never end up attending. But most students take part in some area of student culture at some point. The Uni experience is about more than just churning people out with an education, just as our society is about more than just an economy.

What does the Union do anyway?

I can’t remember the whole list of things the Union funds, but the most important service I think they provide is a childcare service. Parents should have the right to a good education. Parents also need to be close to their children. If we let the University’s childcare service come under corporate control, the service may become overly-expensive for student parents or it may disappear altogether. Let’s not go back to a society where mothers are forced to go without a career so they can stay home to look after the kids.

Student Unions: You may not need them today, but it’s like insurance against what you might need tomorrow.

Comments
on Apr 20, 2005
Great, then Unions can destroy higher education like they've destroyed labor rights.

"Voluntary Unionism" is kind of an oxymoron. Any union that has enough power to make a difference, also has enough power to cause membership to be mandatory (actually or politically).

The purpose of a Uni education is to broaden minds and horizons for students. If there are no requirement which take a student out of their comfort zones, how are their horizons and minds supposed to be broadened?

That being said, yes, students' rights do need to be respected, and there needs to be a means for grievances to be addressed. At the college I attended, we brought about a lot of change through the deans, the ombudsman's office and letters to the editor of the school newspaper. The school didn't always please us with their responses, but there were enough changes made for us to see that they were listening. It's too bad all schools aren't like that.
on Apr 26, 2005
champ, you know i'm not exactly the most left-wing, pro-union person around, but i believe student union membership should be compulsory. as you said, things like childcare and legal representation (not to mention the refecs) are important. the majority of students starting university are 17-year-olds who are not going to volunteer to pay an extra $200 a year to go to uni. if only a handful of students choose to pay, prices for these union-subsidised benefits will likely go up for everybody (including union members) but if payment is compulsory, there's enough funds for the union to actually be effective. in my mind, unions are pretty much an all-or-none thing.

i'm not much of an arguer, so what i'm really trying to say is... up with compulsory union membership!!! (a phrase I truly never thought i'd say)
on Apr 27, 2005
I liked this.
on May 03, 2005
Para, quite frankly I don't think you know what you're talking about. This is one article that isn't for the Americans, it's a quintessentially Australian issue.

Teegs, thanks, interesting insight. Funnily enough, this is possibly the left wing issue I'm least passionate/worried about. Particularly union-wise. I find the proposed changes to workplace legislation far more worrying. You only have to look as far as our Northern neighbours to see what happens when the Unions in the workplace have no power. Without them Australia would have no minimum wage. And already we're seeing bosses exploit their workers with longer, unpaid hours and expectations that people will work in worse conditions without complaint. And of course we have no opportunity to complain without a Union to back us up.

Ronnie, I'm glad.

But I'm particularly interested to know what Toblerone thinks?
on May 03, 2005
Para, quite frankly I don't think you know what you're talking about. This is one article that isn't for the Americans, it's a quintessentially Australian issue.


Oh really? The purpose of the Uni in Australia is quintessentially different than anywhere else? That is strange since every example you bring up occurs in U.S. colleges and universities (as well, I'd suspect, in those of many nations).

But what do I know, I'm just a yank who thought I'd reply to your forum. Excuse me for butting in! ;~D
on May 04, 2005
I wasn't aware that student union membership was compulsory in the US at the moment, but I guess you'd know a lot better Parated2k. The things you learn every day.

Personally I'm a bit ambivalent about the whole student unionism thing. I don't use their services at the moment, and don't really consider the 200-plus dollars for the union membership a worthwhile sacrifice for what is usually only about 20 bucks savings from union-supported facilities.

I'm far more concerned about the change in name of HECS. With a name like FEES-HELP you just know that eventually there's going to be a cash upfront component coming pretty soon. That word 'help' rather than the commonly known HECS is a pretty big pointer to yet another change.